Free kindle Against Fairness author Stephen T. Asma – latinboyz4play.com
Wow Who could be against fairnessWell Stephen Asma the author of Against Fairness is He claims that Fairness has become muddled with a sense of effusive empathy so that Eual OUTCOMES has often become the oal of public policy School kids these days have to send a valentine to every other kid in the class Everybody The Complete Calvin and Hobbes [Box Set] gets a cupcake Everybody wins a prize for running the race Nobody s feelingset hurt The author doesn t like this trend He argues that this confused sense of Fairness has distorted policies such as Affirmative Action But Asma Um Natal em Ardmore goes further He says Nepotism which often congers up the idea of corruption is actually behavior than benefits yourroup or tribe and that nepotism is a fundamental part of human social behavior than even reciprocityThe basic agument against absolute euality made by Libertarians and many Conservatives is that people are eual before the law but otherwise they remain in competition with each other Stephen Asma identifies himself as a LiberalWhat is Fairness For Jonathan Haidt author of the study of Moral Foundations who is mentioned in the book it is one of the two most important moral values that Liberals use to evaluate public policy The other Haidt calls Caring Conservatives tend to ive three other values Loyalty Authority and Purity eual if not reater weight than to these first two Jonathan Haidt contrasts Fairness with Cheating some kind of illegal or unethical advantage that one person takes of another So in his mind Fairness means no hidden advantagePolitical Philosopher John Rawls is at the heart of this dispute He developed the current Liberal case for Justice as the veil of ignorance Make no public policy that doesn t identify and reject the special advantages that some people et without meritAsma argues that kinship nepotism and favoritism are in fact the earliest moral positions of every human being in every culture He d likely score highest on Loyalty using Haidt s scale I don t think making sure every kid in the classroom ets a valentine undermines a proper civic sense of Justice Perhaps we can t love all of humanity as Asma claims the Neo Hippies maintain but I do think empathy is broad enough to include a school classroom And yes I do think a ribbon for everyone who ran the race is a little excessive Asma says complex So Far from the Sea grievances about social justiceet reduced down to cries for The Wolfs Healing Touch (Wolves of Stone Ridge greater fairness because we lack a nuanced moral vocabulary I think he s right about that Aood. From the school yard to the workplace there’s no charge damning than “You’re being unfair” Born out of democracy and raised in our open markets fairness has become our de facto modern creed The very symbol of American ethics Lady Justice wears a blindfold as she weighs the law on her impartial scale In our zealous pursuit of fairness we have banished our urges to like one person than another one thing over another hiding them away as dirty secrets of our humanity In Against Fairness polymath philosopher Stephen T Asma drags them triumphantly back into the light Through playful witty but always serious arguments and examples he vindicates our unspoken and undeniable instinct to favor making the case that we would all be better off if we.
Stephen T. Asma Ú 5 Free read
Free kindle Against Fairness author Stephen T. Asma – latinboyz4play.com
Means nothing if it does not mean loving some people than othersThe focus on euality of outcome may produce a The Draft generation burdened with an indignant sense of entitlement 80% of success ma Pleaseive my review a helpful vote Fairness by Stephen T AsmaThis is a short book that argues in favor of nepotism Author Stephen T Asma constructs a contrarian against what he calls the Bible Prophecy greatrid of impartiality He argues that the modern notion that we should be fair and impartial to everyone whether they be family members or strangers is contrary to hard wired human psychology The idea that a father would not pull strings to save the life of This book is a bit of a counterpoint to another one I previously read Against Empathy The Case for Rational Compassion they weren t written for that purpose but that s how it worked out in my reading Now I thought this book would intone against the sort of fairness demanded by a fourth Yaratma Cesareti grade teacher in someovernment left wing brain washing operation aka public school insisting that all outcomes must be eual or some bureaucrat who somehow things affirmative action is fair now that s a book I could The Astral Codex get behind But Asma s book could just as easily have been titled for favoritism And he s REALLY for it So much so that he can write things like Lying to strangers to advantage kin is not a major sin in my book He favors favoritism so much that his morality hasone off the rails Part of this is likely an overreaction to his upbringing in Catholicism a faith he now repudiates Not that he ever Here There Be Witches grasped the faith all that well he somehow twists John 316 to see it as reason some people care for a faraway African tribe than their own family evenoing so far as to accuse God of transcendentally bad parenting This is a bit ironic because the sort of ospel that John 316 should have been evidence for his case for God is surely not interested in fairness as clad for by the sort of people demanding 50M from Yale for another minority student center And yet he totally misses the pointI made it through this book and really came to one conclusion Stephen Asma will love you if your his friend but if not you re up the creek While I hated some parts of this book I can t make too scathing a statement because I have to begrudgingly admit it s not wholly awful I still feel that it s flawed howeverAn example of this tension is the treatment of rac Excellent book A bit boring and many references to bible and Greek stories. Tzsche he reveals how we have confused fairness with noble traits like compassion and open mindedness He dismantles a number of seemingly egalitarian pursuits from class wide Valentine’s Day cards to civil rights to reveal the envy that lies at their hearts oing on to prove that we can still be kind to strangers have no prejudice and fight for eual opportunity at the same time we reserve the best of what we can offer for those dearest to us Fed up with the blue ribbons for all absurdity of “fairness” today and wary of the psychological paralysis it creates Asma resets our moral compass with favoritism as its lodestar providing a strikingly new and remarkably positive way to think through all our actions big and small?.
Poke at the overly exalted position of the concept of fairness along with a defense of favoritism Very thought provoking A Fake Mustache great challenge to many of my assumptions Read this after reading an Asma essay in the NYT blog While there were some interesting moments I found this title to be ultimately disappointing Perhaps I wax curmudgeonly here because I expected something different those expectations being set by the titleIn defining fairness as eual outcomes the author posits himself as reallyoing out on a limb by being against the forced distribution of eual outcomes Hence the title and the somewhat over stated cover photo Maybe at Columbia this is Desert Rose and Her Highfalutin Hog going out on a limb but not so much in the broader meeting place of ideasAside from the very informative and interesting though short section on the bio chemical basis for favoritism I found the remaining material and analysis to be a mixed bag In specific Asma takes a variety of international cross cultural trips to show where favoritism and tribalism are beneficial finally landing in the US to then support the motivations of almost every confiscation program since LBJ He states he is against fairness but seemingly has no problem with taking and using other people s assets in order to address the perceived issues of less successful parties for whatever they feel they are owed and for whatever reasons they feel they are owed BummerBecause of this contradiction I found myself about 60% in and unable to articulate his basic point a point that had seemed clear in the first 30% of the book Whenever that has happened in the past I ve held myself accountable andone back to piece things together In this case alone I actually held the writer accountable His sub points did not harmonize with one another nor did they add up to a directed wholeIn the end I could not figure out who the audience was supposed to be nor the central message to that audience I liked it an interesting read And I ve heard an interview with him Favoritism is in us I suppose we ought not to deny it but balance it with societal needs And I agree with him that we need to be specific with the word fairness it really does et used as a blanket term when we actually mean other things Gandhi recommended that the seeker of ood have no exclusive loves because they will introduce loyalty partiality bias and favoritism To love everyone we cannot preferentially love any individual or Hey Wait a Minute! Five Rough and Reluctant Sex Erotica Stories group Orwell however believed that love. Showed our unfair tendencies a little kindness indeed if we favored favoritism Conscious of the egalitarian feathers his argument is sure to ruffle Asma makes his point by synthesizing a startling array of scientific findings historical philosophies cultural practices analytic arguments and a variety of personal and literary narratives toive a remarkably nuanced and thorough understanding of how fairness and favoritism fit within our moral architecture Examining everything from the survival enhancing biochemistry that makes our mothers love us to the motivating properties of our “affective community” he not only shows how we favor but the reasons we should Drawing on thinkers from Confucius to Tocueville to Nie.
Stephen T Asma is Professor of Philosophy at Columbia College Chicago where he holds the title of Distinguished Scholar He is the author of Why We Need Religion Oxford and Against Fairness University of Chicago Press among othersIn 2003 he was Visiting Professor at the Buddhist Institute in Phnom Penh Kingdom of Cambodia There he taught Buddhist Philosophy as part of their pilot